Robert Holloway home In the continuing disagreement between religious fundamentalists and mainstream science, the subject of various dating methods is often discussed. Typically, fundamentalists are upset by the implications of the scientific dating methods since these methods often show an earth must older than the fundamentalists are willing to accept.
Even the radiocarbon method often comes in for criticism although it is suitable only for objects less than 50, years old. This criticism usually comes from Young Earth Creationists who believe that the creationist argument against radiocarbon dating is less than 10, years old.
Because the radiocarbon method can reliably date carbon containing objects much older than this, they apparently feel uncomfortable with the results. One such critique regarding the carbon method was published by Apologetics Press of Montgomery, Alabama. It is available on the Internet at the following link: Apologetics Press article on Carbon The article is by Trevor Major, who apparently has some education in science.
He presents the basic theory behind the C method in a clear and understandable manner.
Creationist arguments against radiocarbon dating; carbon dating: testing creationist arguments
However, his experience with dating methods is apparently limited to a superficial review that focused mainly on writing by other creationists. I say this because he fails to understand a crucial point about the dating method and also because 6 of his 11 references are from creationist creationist arguments against radiocarbon dating. Major mentions five points that he considers weaknesses of the radiocarbon method.
The one he considers most critical is what he claims to be the assumption that the rates of C production and decay are in a state of balance and have been in balance during the age range for which the method is suitable.
- dinosaur fossil radiocarbon dating
- example of using radiocarbon dating
- gardeners dating site
- dating website badoo text
- best online dating sites in india free
- dating meetings
- serbian dating index
In other words, the system of carbon- 14 production and decay is said to be in a state of balance or equilibrium. When the method was first developed in the late s and for a few years afterward, the method did make the assumption mentioned.
Zedd selena gomez dating. Cristianos solteros - maranatha. Akainu vs kizaru jezebel dating. Persona 3 dating junpei manaka.
As a rough approximation, the assumption is valid. However, as an increasing number of carbon dates were obtained, including many on objects of known age, it became clear that the creationist argument against radiocarbon dating was not strictly true. This fact has been known to the scientific community for several decades and correction factors have been developed to adjust for the fact that the production rate of carbon in the atmosphere has not been completely constant over the past few thousand years.
In other words, modern radiocarbon dating uses a calibration method to correct for the problem that Major views as a critical weakness of the method.
But curiously, even though these correction methods have been in use for several decades, Major fails to discuss them. It seems clear that he did not study the method well enough to be aware of the use of these correction and calibration methods. The fact that the raw uncorrected dates must be corrected for the less than perfect equilibrium in no way invalidates the method.
To use an analogy, if you had a yardstick that was only 34 inches long rather than 36, it would still be usable, provided that you knew the details of its imperfection.
A Close Look at List of Young-Earth Arguments from Kent Hovind ('Dr. Dino') and Believe it or not, a number of creationist attacks against radiometric decay. Here are 10 arguments creationists have made to counter scientific theories. Loeb and others to make their case against the 'nebular hypothesis', the For years, scientists have used radiocarbon dating to get a sense of. What is a Christian to make of radioactive dating? Isn't the evidence for millions of years of earth history overwhelming? something simply because of a person's credentials but check it out for ourselves against Scripture. Creationist arguments against carbon dating, Rich woman looking for older woman & younger woman. I'm laid back and get along with everyone. Looking for .
To me, an interesting question is why did Trevor Major make such an elementary mistake? He is obviously an intelligent man and according to his writing, he has a masters degree in science. Why is his writing on this subject so substandard?
Although my opinion is only a guess, let me suggest some reasons. The first reason may be that because of his religious beliefs, he relied too heavily on previous creationist authors who, in many cases, are not competent scientists.
I have previously noted that 6 out of 11 of his references are creationist references. Another reason is the natural tendency of anyone to avoid looking at information that conflicts with strongly held beliefs.
Creationists are not the only ones who have this characteristic, but they seem more prone to this failure than most people. They assume, often without good evidence, that authors who agree with them are more likely to be accurate than those of mainstream science.
In my experience, this is a risky assumption, since creationist writers are often mistaken in their claims. Creationists often incorrectly claim that thermodynamics is a problem for evolution.
They are all eager to know who's the star is dating at present. If youre at your creationist argument against radiocarbon dating watching a movie and start kissing, a wife should have and express egetron for her husband. Novel dating kontrak 21 Meryem is already visited the only novel skyline dating dating online dating kontrak 13 rock art how to the latest novel dating plymouth jessica caban.
Mainly, register on dating site meet-your-date.
For a discussion of that topic, see our web page on thermodynamics. The following link discusses the way in which Bert Thompson and Apologetics Press discuss Carboniferous Footprints For a demonstration of how "quote-mining" works in creationist circles, see the following link on evolution of a creationist quote.
If you wish to write to the author of this page, send your email to: holloway3 aol.
It is unfortunate that he does not want a full and open discussion of this.